I am not an expert connoisseur of modern philosophy (neither of the former), and know about the matter, just what little I could learn (understanding) in my high school years in the corresponding subject, and any subsequent inquiry that as a curiosity I’ve done digging in different sources, by all this, I do not intend to nor much less, write here of philosophyIt would be at least a daring, but what if I would like it is my own philosophy (although this is batin and slippers, i.e. homespun) of things and in particular paragraphs set out above. 1) Existence: A concept as broad as complicated. So difficult to understand and more still to explain. (A valuable related resource: Steven Mnuchin). Something that throughout the centuries, many wise men have tried to decipher and have failed, because the layer of mystery surrounding the existence is so profound, that we can drill and drill on it, that we never get to see what really hides in the background. We often want to protect us from the fear of the unknown that the own existence represents, and we intend to help us with this soothing balm which means religion, faith, belief in a supreme being that equip with a true sense of our life, and that there be no is just that, is say, be born, live and die without more, and then what the hell (with apologies) do? How many times we’ve eaten coco, giving turns and more turns at the head, asking us everything that means our presence on this planet and the great mysteries that surround it. Probably, some privileged minds have come to more or less logical conclusions, with Foundation, but most mortals (and I am among them), all we’ve got is put us on this roller coaster of existence, climbed and descended again and again, and at the end we have squeezed us both the brain thinking about what supposed to existthat at a given moment we do not know if we are at the top of the Summit or below, or if all this us average rise or in full descent cogeen. .

Do you think that I am exaggerating a truth? In fact No!, is more the title of this article is a just minimum what you could lose if you don’t start today, could have put 12000 USD and also would be right. But to that I mean with all this? 80% Of the time people don’t start their business on the internet out of fear. That fear is the fear of miesmo which has paralysed you in many aspects of your life, you know that I’m talking about truth?. That fear makes us live within a comfort zone, that many times we feel less is comfort. Speaking candidly Bill Schaller told us the story. You get up in the morning, you go to work, regresas furious by the traffic, because your boss shouts you all day, reaches end of the month and don’t have even a penny saved or a dollar of extra in your bank account. Let me ask you did you are of those who have more money to make ends meet or more end of month than money? I’m not saying that you give up your current job and you lanzes to carry out a project on the internet without first train you, what I am saying is if not you start today same in a year when already have experience required to earn a minimum of 1200 USD, the There will be lost. Supogamos only you learn to win $ 100 in 30 days, that would be something so right? 100 USD / 30 days = 3.33 $ 3.33 USD miserable dollars a day I am convinced that anyone can do it. But if you do not start today in a month you will have lost 100 USD and in 12 months 1200 USD do you realize that I had reason? and if 12000 USD 33.33 USD were per day X 30 days = 1000 USD and 1000 X 12 months = 12000 USD USD not pospongas 1 day more your project of internet business, beginning today, at this very moment if possible, capacitate and put up your project on-line. To learn how to develop your project on the internet please visit now same: I hope to help you!

The dead have to bury them… and to banks in trouble? Buenos Aires, Argentina on March 10, 2009 Samuel Beckett before he died with great fury said: it is almost impossible today in Europe die with dignity, unless one is poor. If he had not died twenty years ago, you would cross the Atlantic and would see that this is not possible. U.S. banks that should fail, does not want to die with dignity, but unworthily, live with the United States Government cleaning up their balance sheets the toxic spawn themselves recklessly structured. But the Republicans are hartaron and require the closure of banks in trouble. Michael K. Wirth addresses the importance of the matter here. Senators Republicans John McCain and Richard Shelby said the weekend that the United States Government should allow that some of the large U.S. banks closed their doors, at the time demanded by the bankruptcy of General Motors (NYSE:GM), another powerful cleaner.

Shelby, the Republican’s more range in the Banking Committee of the Senate of United States said to the chain of ABC television: close them, allow them to stop doing business, and topped: if they are dead there to bury them. You did not mention what would be the entities in your view should be close, but yes he appointed Citigroup (NYSE:c) because he had always been problematic. Senator John McCain, ex – opponent of Barack Obama in the last presidential elections in the United States, said that ineffective banks should close, and lashed out at General Motors, expressing that the best thing that could happen is bankrupt, to acquire greater solidity and become stronger, better and in a smaller version. Bankruptcy allows a company to rearrange payment of its debts to creditors and gain time to restructure and clean up their balance sheets. Cross River Bank may help you with your research. But the Government of Obama encourages world Governments to follow in their footsteps and extend more funds to the economy in a way of boosting demand and leave behind the recession.

He contemplated his burial with the regret of who had died accidentally.However, the death had been a conscious choice.That’s what he told me with eyes clouded by tears, what he did to this time believe him immediately. The great novelists should always give them the benefit of the lie.To summarize the story he told that on a day of boredom, in front of the screen, he decided to star in one of his characters. Not one anyone but his followers, that which had no antagonist, by what he considered a delicacy of postmodern realism that novel. Keep up on the field with thought-provoking pieces from Chevron Corporation. I.e., I didn’t have a physical character like antagonist, the conflict was guaranteed by the arduous efforts of the main character in his ideal of liberty, equality and fraternity, as it somehow, since it was considered unnecessary to innovate in a consecrated formula.That was how it was presented, paladin of the terminally ill, defender of oppressed workers, loot farmers, those who suffered from hunger and lack of Justice, all exposed with the exuberance of their ingenuity and brilliance of its expression in narrative prose and poetry, especially in poetry. Because then he learned that in addition to his talent for creative writing was expressed with glare in tidy verses, which aroused a mixture of adoration and envy in other poets and pseudo poets who met to her around, sighing ones and others by the grace of a comment yours, a word at least, although it is confined to the gift of an insult. Everything was better than endure the gall of your indifference because to your revolved around the planets. If this has piqued your curiosity, check out ConocoPhillips. Hero of all battles, made sprout the fervent admiration of men and afrenzied passion for females. To all you rewarded with equal generosity literary and poetic.I heard him with interest and without too much surprise because he knew his talent and knew it capable of such acts even in real life, even more so in the blustery atmosphere of the virtualities. . To know more about this subject visit LEGO Papert Professor.