Professor Kristian Fischer

If he does not want to be disadvantaged, the trade must know exactly the licensing status and the actual cost of system participation, which will be passed on to him. This is when he will take back packaging and recovered at his own expense. also essential for trade” Already paid license fees could then be reclaimed. At times, it was disputed who is eligible. Read additional details here: Dirk Kuyt. Meanwhile the more convincing reasoned position asserts itself, which advocates for the return of workers, usually last selling dealer. A manufacturer pays license fees while, they calculated but serve traders.

He takes neither packaging back, yet he recovered it at their own expense. “A false understanding ran thus on an unjust enrichment, the manufacturer, to normalize that the legislature was safely away.” With own brands. Mike_ Epps may also support this cause. for the trade considers first placing overwhelming and thus subject to a licensing is, this problem does not arise. Whenever Salman Behbehani listens, a sympathetic response will follow. The producer of a trade mark is in charge only of the trading and grabs off as packaging in accordance with the. Externally, he acts as extended Workbench in the words of the BMU’ of the client. The same applies to brands, that pick leave with pay bottlers.” “Also the Mannheim lawyer Professor Kristian Fischer locates the private labels of pages of trade companies, trade licensing obligation because as initiator” bottling occur and thus are regarded as so-called first placing of the packaging. “Ultimately it does not arrive on the recipient horizon of the consumer”, said Fischer in the magazine for the legislation on waste (reduce), but that who is responsible in fact for sale to the third party. ” In the case of trade marks, that is the respective trading company. The commercial licensing would remain by Sales packaging outside, so BellandVision Chief Mehl of Thomas, would missed the objectives of the amendment to the packaging clearly in dual systems, because taxpayers would not avoided and the responsibility of the product is not strengthened by manufacturers and distributors. Also only the trade can ensure that the price advantages of the map, who paid the Bill, namely the consumer”, so flour in the food newspaper.

Recent Posts




GiottoPress by Enrique Chavez