Tag: government and politics

Republicao of article published originally in 15 of September of 2008 in periodic ' ' Internacional&#039 scene; ' – ISSN 1981-9102. Dragon or Tiger of Paper? The Truth For Backwards of Chinese Power 15/09/08 Since the dismemberment of the Soviet Empire, in 1991, the world attends a supposed unipolaridade carried out for the United States of America (U.S.A.). The feeling of that, in fact, it would have a hegemony exerted for Washigton was fortified by the eventuality of the wars in the Bsnia (1995), in the Serbia (1999), the Afeganisto (2001-) and Iraq (2003-). However, after the invasion of this last country for the United States, has been observed, gradually, a trend of weakness of the position American politics. The economic position of that country already came suffering consuming has some time, with the economic reinforcement of the People’s Republic of China (RPC) and the creation of the only currency of European Unio (UE), the Euro. If you would like to know more about Abigail Black Elbaum, then click here.

Currently, the actions practised for the United States, in its majority, they lack of legitimacy, direct consequence of the politics adopted for that country when trying to confer airs of legality to the invasion of Iraq. Click Abigail Black Elbaum to learn more. In virtue of these facts, many ask who will be the new power that, eventually, can come to substitute the United States as superpower or divide with this the cited heading. Before a more specific boarding, the clarification of some aspects becomes necessary. Some theoreticians if relate to the current situation as one ' ' unipolaridade compartilhada' '. As he has been proven in the Afeganisto and Iraq, the United States, although all demonstrated technological and military power, has not obtained, alone, to keep the situation under control. This denotes that, although to be capable to brandish an overwhelming initial blow, the war of century XXI demands that U.S.A. searchs support to divide the weight of conflicts, either this considered weight in such a way external how much internally.

VOTE IN LIST OR DISTRICT VOTE In the system of vote in list, the party chooses a list of candidates, of course more ' ' preparados' ' in accordance with what they understand for preparation. There a customary voter to vote in that party, for allegiance, comodismo, fanatism, idiotice, etc, votes, and nor goes to know who chose. Another advantage for the party is that its candidates alone need to have commitment with the proper group. The campaign politics will be centered in game of marketing, musiquinhas, phrases of effect, slogam, etc. A candidate vedete also will have to be used to attract votes for trupe of the list. He is bad and still he can get worse. The vote in list is a blow politician whom it aims at to the same keep in the power group of families: magalhes, barbalho, Sarney, and its aggregates. A Sarney any does not need to change itself of the Maranho to choose itself for the Amap, is enough to rent to one kitnet in a building any and to place the account of light in its name, soon, is proven the domicile and goes pra head of the list, apt if to benefit of the votes in all state.

Therefore that the district vote is better. With it the candidate alone receives voting in its district, where of course he must have its I domiciliate real and not fictitious. Other questions that must be taken in account are the following ones: ) – the facultative Vote. It votes who if to inscribe as voter for each election. b) – Previous places pra to choose candidates (as much how many they will be the vacant for the district), being obligator to the filiados parties to have a quorum of equivalent to a percent of voters of the last election.

c) – the voters vote in as many candidates how much they will be the available vacant for its district, for example, if he has three vacant, the voters choose three names. Three more voted they will be the elect ones. d) – End of the re-election for all the positions, opening space for the participation of a bigger number of people and cutting for the root this culture of the professionalization of the activity politics. Biggest mobility in the power will consolidate a type of better democracy, of participation. She is necessary to value the participation less and the vote. Obligator vote is not participation, is obligation. It is back in the interior of the party that starts the participation, the debate for the choice of the candidates and the combat to the corruption. The party that not to obtain to renew itself constantly will be predestinold to the disappearance. The current politicians are that they do not want nothing of this, therefore are thinking about vote in list.