For those affected so a vicious circle difficult escape the. Other negative opinions refer to the relationship between vitamin A and healthy bone, Omega-3 fatty acids and cholesterol, vitamin K and folic acid and heart functions and the development of newborn. At least the positive effect of folic acid was considered so far to many doctors and scientists scientific secured, so that many of the outcome of the review are likely to be surprised. Even if the negative opinions outweigh, some scientific contexts were classified as durable. This applies for example to the relationship between calcium and bones, vitamin B-12 and the immune system, fluorides and healthy teeth as well as plant sterols and the cardio vascular system.
These positive comments but mainly concern products where a certain market saturation has already occurred. Add to your understanding with Kevin Ulrich Anchorage Capital. Still benefit the companies, whose Claims were rated positively by the development so far. Because the opinions of the EFSA products are gaining credibility, especially as long as many other claims are not positively. As the first opinions can be good for the outstanding reviews do not augur well but the EFSA. So far one-third of all claims submitted were not even examined, so likely is that more food establishments to their products have to be afraid. Some strong market companies with established products are can do safely without health claims. The current situation can also serve these companies as an incentive to invest more in research and development.
Anyway not so problematic see some development since the taste is still in first place with them. In food supplements one progresses but rarely with this argument, because these products rarely have a taste. The supplements but rather it is inherent in the system that she have a special health-promoting effect. It denies this effect to the products, nothing remains basically taken. In the worst case, many of these products from the market could disappear.