The article develops consideraes concerning the structural and superstructural aspects of the Moral, under the dialtico point of view, approaching its aspects historically constituent. It will be looked to demonstrate the historicidade of the subject, its dimensions public and private. Word-key: Moral, History, Philosophy, Cultural Anthropology. According to Max Schireson, who has experience with these questions. It counts the Bible that in the principle God created the sky and the 2 land. It explains despite the project the holy ghost foresaw a creation of which the man usufructed everything under the only condition of that if It subordinated, inside of a proposal of life and fraternity. 3 As to justify then the perverse civilizatrio effect throughout the history of the humanity? Under the Metaphysical ‘, point of view; ‘ the self-sufficiency is the mother of all males, that they are only consequence of it. (A valuable related resource: Crumpton Group).
God is absolute you and its project of life is freedom for all, in the climate of fraternity and 4 allotment . However, in the historical optics, the ways as the men had produced and reproduced its material relations of existence throughout the social time, relations that had established independent of its wills in function of this, with its ideological, cultural social consequences, politics etc. that they had resulted in the society of classrooms explain the disruption with the project the holy ghost and the necessity of concerts, (attention revision: it is concert with ‘ ‘ c’ ‘ exactly. It reads that is erases of the text) the example of ‘ ‘ 10 Mandamentos’ ‘. To these concerts of – the name of Moral. From there its normative, postulating characteristics. In principle, the moral comes to decide concrete problems that hinder the basic socialization, which, when without solution, they become the man ‘ ‘ wolf of proper homem’ ‘ , as it wanted Hobbes, in the Leviatham: (…) ‘ ‘ In such situation it does not have place for the industry, therefore its fruit is uncertain; consequently, it does not have culture of the land, nor navigation, nor use of the merchandises that can be imported by the sea; nor comfortable constructions, nor instruments to move and to remove the things that they need great force; not it has knowledge of the face of the Land, nor I compute of the time, nor arts, nor letters; it does not have the society; what it is worse of the everything, one constant fear and violent risk of death.
The sign becomes goal in-itself, creating a constructive logic of hermutica, where a parallel universe is servant, occurring one amalgam between possible and the ideal, authorizing us one to act a posteriori referenciado for a priori one and, what it foments a contradiction between abstract and Real. The logic of transmutao between Real and abstract is auto-destructive, having as conclusion the mutual destruction, for the fact of both to leave of being. However, a differential of the logicidade displayed here is presented inside, in view of the ideal to surpass, or proficient metaphysics, that sends to us another perspective to it, therefore concatenates a multifaceted, possible hermeneutics of an inverse dialectic, where theses and antithesis are articulated in an ambiguous prism. Thinking about the Metaphysical transmutao where the infinite if finda in this representation logic-lingustica-racionalizante, also will be possible to conceive the conceptual destruction, surpassing the language, as it displayed Jacques Derrida, therefore as well as the language with its estruturao clerk it came to verwhelm the said noise, becoming the man in service contemporary of one linguistic semiotics, is necessary to renounce of this another imagtica conception, killing it while felt. From there the foucaultiana logicidade when presenting not only the evidence, but the necessity of findar ' ' homem' ' , in the same way as previous to this, Nietzsche it announced the death of God, since as it displayed Foucault well, only can be eternalized what it perishes, therefore being alive, tends to die. Concluding itself, that the death of the language would authorize the infinite to transmutar itself in a extrapolao of the daily pay-consecutive goal, reaching one summu abstractu of return to the not materialize cognitivo field, revigorating a proficient metaphysics that verwhelms the enclasurante language and revigorates the ad idea-idealizante infinitum..
The humanity possesss the full college today to evoke any form of knowledge. the man, searching always something more than can solve its problems, pursuing the answers for the adversities that face, unchained increasing process of activity on the nature, producing technology – the result of the applied knowledge? exploring everything that finds in its half one, also its social reception system, politics and, even though, its proper college to know (MEZZAROBA; HUNTER, 2008, P. 4). The Knowledge is a constant process learning, before if becoming something systemize, that is, with theoretical and practical basements, it suffer many influences, therefore the same it depends on the way that we are inserted. As he cites Mezzaroba authors and Monteiro (2008, P. 4-5) the knowledge is not a goal to be reached and yes a process that if constructs and reconstructs daily. He compares the same with a great river that possesss some trajectories, diverse landscapes, receives tributaries, if he transforms into streams, waterfalls, this everything before emptying in the ocean. The authors attribute two types of knowledge citizens, one is that one that knows and the other is to be known object, both is on for the knowledge.
‘ ‘ The knowledge is the result of a relation that if establishes between a citizen that knows, that we can call citizen cognoscente, and an object to be known, the object cognoscvel’ ‘ (MEZZAROBA; HUNTER, 2008 P. 7). The knowledge has diverse objects so that the information and new knowledge leave that can be or not scientific, had infinity of existing things in the world and the majority of them created by the men who search each time new forms to know.
Nancy Chodorow adopted the concept of system of sex-sort in its study of the social organization of the education in the family, who produces the women as capable of not hostile relations of what the men, but that also it perpetuates the position subordinates of the women by means of its production as people structuralized for the maternity in the patriarchate and defines that ' ' identity of gnero' ' , with its net of meanings of the empirical social science, that is deferential of ' ' acquisition of position of subjetividade' ' , with its net of meanings of the empirical social science, that is different of ' ' acquisition of subjectivity position sexuada' '. For Evelyn Keller sort it is a social, symbolic reception system and psychic in the which men and women differently they are placed. ' ' …… The sort expression is as a cognitiva experience in which the masculine psychic individuation produces an investment in the impessoalidade, the reificao and dominao' ' Keller described its project to try to understand ' ' system of science-gnero' ' emphasizing the social construction and concentrating themselves in the psicodinmicos aspects of this construction, Keller developed its thesis with the objective to know as the construction of men and women affected the construction of science. Haraway still cites theoreticians as Carby, Spillers, Hurtado who had questioned the concept of sort through an exploration of the history and the consequences of these subjects.
E concludes its article saying that the fact to remain man or woman marked for the sort is a question eminently politics, therefore the power clarifying politician and of the category ' ' social' ' on sort it depends on the historicizao of the categories of sex, meat, body, biology, race and nature, that had generated the concept of sex system/sort at a moment and a particular place in the implodidas theory feminist being in, located articulated, differentiated, responsible theories of the corporificao and with consequences, in which the nature more is not imagined and represented as resource for the culture or the sex for the sort. Being thus the sort concept it was developed as a category to explore what it means ' ' mulher' ' , to problematizar what he was previously given. The differences between men and women are marked strong by the society who we live. The form to deal with one or another sex is delimitante factor in the social relations. Since small we are codified by the biological sex and predestined to follow the social standards destined to each one of them.
When the trainee came back to the section where he worked, already he was not a trainee, therefore the guillotine of Maximiliem had decaptado it to Robespierre. Pablo registered occurrence in 5 police station of the Policy Civilian of the Federal District. The fury of the president of the STJ, in thesis, if would fit in the crime of moral siege, and would have severely to be punished, case the inquiry of the STF concludes that the minister committed the alleged facts. If a brutality of this cannot leave to pass uninjured. The career of the magistrate, possibly constructed with very work and study, beyond the qualities that if they demand of a magistrate cannot eximiz it of the legal responsibility, quite to the contrary, its power and its knowledge functions as aggravations for the act insane.
The magistrate must be an example of to be followed behavior. However, he will be that we can or we must follow the model of behavior of the minister? The professor and Alberto sociologist Carlos Almeida ' wrote the book; ' The Head of the Brasileiro' ' , a workmanship that argues the moral and ethical behavior of the Brazilian, with special focus for the study of ' ' jeitinho brasileiro' ' , where some people if find equal than all and still they use themselves of the expression: ' ' You know with who you are falando' '. Antidemocratic attitude occured discriminatory in the STJ discloses the attitude patrimonialista of the Public Agents, who transform the use of public good into particular use, as she became at the time of ' ' El Rei' '. Summary resignation, without defense or contraditrio. I control and you obey. He only remains in to wait them the decision of the constitutional guard of the Country, the STF, and to make choir with Boris Casoy: THIS IS A SHAME!
Only the first three stages of life for every individual's specific, differing from other people bodily form, having visible to us: color, size, weight, volume. Beginning with the fourth form of life, the human soul and its material elements enter into more complex relationships that are not associated with a particular body shape, discernible human senses. These relationships are maintained at the level of the material, which we probably will soon learn to distinguish or identify with sophisticated instruments. I think that such tools are already able to provide us today: science, engineering and technology. But I know and categorically affirm that the material (physical) part of the remains with each individual and after the death of his warm-blooded forms and continues to be strong relationship with his soul. All human incarnation, and those who are endowed with flesh; those who have been more complex material structure are stable, strong ideas about independence, limbs and superiority is their stage of life.
Each successive stage has a large increase in duration in comparison with the previous. Transition to each next stage of the material body of each person actively resists. But Nature is so arranged that prevent the inevitability of such a transition is impossible! The very first stage is the stage of conception. That it precedes (not in the commonly held view that in achromatic) will be discussed in the next chapter. Now focus on description of specific stages of our lives. At the moment of conception (egg fusion with the most active sperm) A person gets from the nature of any of their spiritual qualities, which at that moment generated by the Spirit, and who becomes his soul, which in turn will live life is incomparably longer than those organic compounds that are solid components of this life.
Filogeneticamente we start in them becomes human beings from the ancestral birth of common the simiescos and homindeos that are the Rhamapitecus, that in turn gave origin to the first men, amongst them the Homo Erectus, that has as representative the boy of Turkana, with the evolution of this, we start to have characteristics who are the mark of the modern man or the species Homo Sapiens as, for example, the bipedismo. The presented erect position first for the Homo Erectus was the basic step for the transformation, as well as the manufacture of instruments of work, the possible celebrations of rituals, the necessity to communicate ones with the others. These had been some steps for the biological construction of the man. But as in them we become human beings, as we appropriate in them of this condition of being social? To understand better as if gave this acquisition, will be made a brief historical summary, starting for the primitive societies that already had inherited the organizacional way them first existing primates, its main activities were the collection of what the nature gave, were nomadic and they were not organized in social classrooms. Exactly without having social division and being nomadic, the work already existed, providing a knowledge about what it was its return, later they would pass if to fix in an environment and would go to be able to discover and if to benefit of cattle agriculture and, appearing from there a economic excess. With the sprouting of the economic excess, the exploration of the man for the man became lucrative, therefore, in this way, if appropriating it its fellow creature, would relieve exceeding more, more profits. Of this relation of exploration two antagonistic classrooms appear: the ones that work and the ones that explore the work other people’s, without right the freedom, being this last one called of escravismo.
Using this exactly meant that it has for the Philosophy, the true love for the human beings also is a feeling of search for what in it lacks, being that this gap can be filled by diverse types of object. Emotionally, to love is to search the other, one somebody that supplies our affective lacks and spirituals. In the point of view of the philosophers, the love I legitimize search for its complementation. Express for Plato, and a feeling of the soul when it feels that she lost its divine condition. However, if the love in itself is a feeling many times understood in errnea way for the society, still more badly interpreted is the point of view of Plato to this respect.
For many, platonic love is that one not reached, that is only in the will far from the objective. But in the vision of Plato, the true love is the love of the soul for the knowledge and the side spiritual of the life, related to a souvenir. According to thought and philosopher, the true love is an impulse of life for the wisdom and not necessarily for a person. Plato said that we can find in the nature perfect models that do not exist physically, but are in a called plan ' ' Plan of Idias' '. Of the point of view of the Philosophy, then, the love is a force, an energy, that if manifest in the soul as a feeling of souvenirs of that the soul already had, but lost, being the love a species of lack in this point of view. Lack that is not represented by somebody crying, but yes for the impulse of that it searchs. Of this form, the platonic love is that one that is not fixed in the transitory one, in the body, in the substance. But yes what it surpasses everything this.
The autonomy is understood as the college of to supply to laws itself exactly. The autonomy possesss two components. The first one is that no external authority we is necessary to constitute or informing in them on the demands of the morality (Cf. Perez, 2005, P. 172). Each one of us knows, without it is said, what it would have to make because the moral requirements are requirements that we impose we ourselves.
As it is that in the autolegislao we can effectively controlling in them. Therefore, no external source of motivation is necessary so that our autolegislao is efficient in controlling our behavior. Thus being, in strict direction, the autonomy not only demands that the law is not given as object, as well as the will is not determined by sensible inclinations. This implies that the autonomy leaves of being legislator and starts to be heternoma. The will, if is independent, alone it can objective be determined by the moral law and subjectively by respect to this law. The mobile of the will must be the proper law.
For this reason, in the ethical plan, action is carried through not only in agreement the duty, but for having, a time that the mobile is enclosed in the law. 2 Distinction between moral and right in the kantiano thought In the kantiana doctrine the basic point of the distinction between moral and right is the mobile by which the legislation is obeyed. In this bias, the absolute reason of the duty for the duty is had concernente the moral, considered legislation internal, and another referring empirical reason to the legal legislation, that is external. To analyze the relation of the moral with the right demands that if it needs the direction these terms, that they possess, to the times, an ample meaning and another restricted one. When distinguishing the laws from the nature of the laws of the freedom, the moral term in Kant acquires ample direction.