VOTE IN LIST OR DISTRICT VOTE In the system of vote in list, the party chooses a list of candidates, of course more ' ' preparados' ' in accordance with what they understand for preparation. There a customary voter to vote in that party, for allegiance, comodismo, fanatism, idiotice, etc, votes, and nor goes to know who chose. Another advantage for the party is that its candidates alone need to have commitment with the proper group. The campaign politics will be centered in game of marketing, musiquinhas, phrases of effect, slogam, etc. A candidate vedete also will have to be used to attract votes for trupe of the list. He is bad and still he can get worse. The vote in list is a blow politician whom it aims at to the same keep in the power group of families: magalhes, barbalho, Sarney, and its aggregates. A Sarney any does not need to change itself of the Maranho to choose itself for the Amap, is enough to rent to one kitnet in a building any and to place the account of light in its name, soon, is proven the domicile and goes pra head of the list, apt if to benefit of the votes in all state.
Therefore that the district vote is better. With it the candidate alone receives voting in its district, where of course he must have its I domiciliate real and not fictitious. Other questions that must be taken in account are the following ones: ) – the facultative Vote. It votes who if to inscribe as voter for each election. b) – Previous places pra to choose candidates (as much how many they will be the vacant for the district), being obligator to the filiados parties to have a quorum of equivalent to a percent of voters of the last election.
c) – the voters vote in as many candidates how much they will be the available vacant for its district, for example, if he has three vacant, the voters choose three names. Three more voted they will be the elect ones. d) – End of the re-election for all the positions, opening space for the participation of a bigger number of people and cutting for the root this culture of the professionalization of the activity politics. Biggest mobility in the power will consolidate a type of better democracy, of participation. She is necessary to value the participation less and the vote. Obligator vote is not participation, is obligation. It is back in the interior of the party that starts the participation, the debate for the choice of the candidates and the combat to the corruption. The party that not to obtain to renew itself constantly will be predestinold to the disappearance. The current politicians are that they do not want nothing of this, therefore are thinking about vote in list.