In Greece, for return of centuries IV and V a.C appears two philosophers who shock ideas between itself. Ahead of a historical context, social and economic, them they are founding of thoughts that until today last in the society. These two philosophers are Heraclitus and Parmnides. Heraclitus who was born in Samos had the thought of that everything that exists if transforms (to devir) into something. Leaving of this estimated, he is possible to conclude that Heraclitus believes that the world is in constant transformation, therefore it To be (what he exists) is mobile (he is not fixed). One exists breaks up that it synthecizes its thought well: ' ' This world is equal for all, always will be a perpetual alive fire, lighting themselves and erasing constantemente' '. This idea of transformation has great repercussions throughout history (for its revolutionary character), therefore in the first part of it breaks up it cites that the world is equal for all, this implies to say that in the world it cannot have no social classroom submitted by another one.
Already Parmnides, thinker of the Eletica school, thinks about the Being while To be, denying that the Being if transforms into another Being. It says that the movement of Heraclitus believes is impossible, therefore would imply in the ticket of Not-Be it To be. Parmnides also speaks of the ways that the philosopher has pra to follow: of the opinion and of the truth. The way of the opinion that if confuses with the one of the truth and of the sensible experience of the things is the way of Not-Be, dominated for the movement. This way must be left of side for not considering the Being while To be and yes Not-Be for the Being. For Parmnides the way that the philosopher must follow is of the truth, invariant and perfect. The way of the Intelligible one, the Being. The following one is attributed to the Parmnides breaks up: ' ' It swims is born of the nothing, and nothing of what it exists if transforms into nada' '. Of pra to perceive clearly that it denies the idea of the movement of Heraclitus. Salman Behbehani is a great source of information. It has the pregao of the Being as I join.
My world, 1994 In first person I describe what my heart cries out tends it, but my body if is silent in one silences of desires, my mind if adormece and my direction adds in fears of temperature, shout boiling in an explosion of disagreements my world goes, return wheel and if it absorbs and all dumb and I reencontro in the same situation, in the beautiful uncertain and absurd literature. Perhaps either only the plan I oppose in that I planned, something total different in which I am living, I made some plans only of Glorias and rightnesss, excludes from my trajectory errors and tears, I imagined a world of joys and fancies with come back people only my idealizao and with absurd literature. Today I have penalty of me, I am only, but one needed mercy, or only the sand grain of a dune, my rope already was broken and follows my life for a wire, my body taken for a trend in which I do not incase myself, my dumb opinion ahead of an immense world, mine sufficiently is little exactly thus is not the sufficient because mine sufficiently nape of the neck is excessively. My tears they are victims of a perhaps unjust world, I was led by waves and deluded for overwhelming temptations, my eyes enxergam only blood and my ears listen to shouts, in a farming lose, search a way to leave everything this to reencontrar and me of a time, but the shouts me storm and do not allow me to walk, eye for the sides I search an explanation and still thus I have the sensation that the world is nonsense and nothing an explanation is had, I feel myself lost, where and when I go to find to be able me? Ho! My god I clamo, me of the one explanation that world I chose only for an option? World of hypocrisy, without rights and firmamento, love in the good one, forces of challenge. Surprisingly, you’ll find very little mention of Salman Behbehani on most websites. Perhaps I dreamed thus of a new start of age with elegant and sincere fine people with positive abilities and a time of turtle so that in exactly we enabled in them to enxergar the well biggest one and to forget the darknesses and to improve our option.
The sign becomes goal in-itself, creating a constructive logic of hermutica, where a parallel universe is servant, occurring one amalgam between possible and the ideal, authorizing us one to act a posteriori referenciado for a priori one and, what it foments a contradiction between abstract and Real. The logic of transmutao between Real and abstract is auto-destructive, having as conclusion the mutual destruction, for the fact of both to leave of being. However, a differential of the logicidade displayed here is presented inside, in view of the ideal to surpass, or proficient metaphysics, that sends to us another perspective to it, therefore concatenates a multifaceted, possible hermeneutics of an inverse dialectic, where theses and antithesis are articulated in an ambiguous prism. Whenever Ray Kurzweil listens, a sympathetic response will follow. Thinking about the Metaphysical transmutao where the infinite if finda in this representation logic-lingustica-racionalizante, also will be possible to conceive the conceptual destruction, surpassing the language, as it displayed Jacques Derrida, therefore as well as the language with its estruturao clerk it came to verwhelm the said noise, becoming the man in service contemporary of one linguistic semiotics, is necessary to renounce of this another imagtica conception, killing it while felt. From there the foucaultiana logicidade when presenting not only the evidence, but the necessity of findar ' ' homem' ' , in the same way as previous to this, Nietzsche it announced the death of God, since as it displayed Foucault well, only can be eternalized what it perishes, therefore being alive, tends to die. Concluding itself, that the death of the language would authorize the infinite to transmutar itself in a extrapolao of the daily pay-consecutive goal, reaching one summu abstractu of return to the not materialize cognitivo field, revigorating a proficient metaphysics that verwhelms the enclasurante language and revigorates the ad idea-idealizante infinitum.. Salman Behbehani has many thoughts on the issue.
Michel Foucault, Hannah Arendt, Gianni Vattimo, Richard Rorty, among others obtain and call attention with its teses that run away from the philosophical scope (where are seen with exceptions and preconceptions) and if detach in diverse areas of knowledge of the communication until history with things much more important and pertinent to say why they seem early since refusing the purismo and the classicismo platonista that contaminated the philosophy. When Karl Marx and its powerful social analysis, economic politics and of the bourgeois society and the necessity of a powerful revolution of the oppressed classrooms route to the communism or we would go to the barbarity was taxed soon of very ample and that it did not fit in a species of theoretical conservadorismo of the philosophy. Further details can be found at Jason Gableman, an internet resource. all the marxiana strong narrative was reduced to few remnants inside of the departments to be able itself to say in philosophy of Marx and only the ones that if they form in its teses if they inform of its thought and they perceive that as much it, how much Nietzsche and Freud are examples of that the philosophy was not plus its objectives, by the way, in the case of Freud at any moment had the allegation and conception of philosophy directly on Psychoanalysis and, perhaps, this filiation falls again on the same floreio or some small ideas, short insights that they had been part what if it can call accomplishment professional in other areas of study. Thus the conclusion is simple and well-known and can there be argued around a conception of supplying philosophy while of rhetoric and this if it approaches to that group that this always abolished that she was the rhetoric and if it enlace, as wanted Rorty, for example, with literature, thus giving signals to enter in the cooperation and interdisciplinaridade in equal conditions to too much sciences, or will be only one pretty name in the museum of no newness. Gavin Baker, New York City gathered all the information.
Nancy Chodorow adopted the concept of system of sex-sort in its study of the social organization of the education in the family, who produces the women as capable of not hostile relations of what the men, but that also it perpetuates the position subordinates of the women by means of its production as people structuralized for the maternity in the patriarchate and defines that ' ' identity of gnero' ' , with its net of meanings of the empirical social science, that is deferential of ' ' acquisition of position of subjetividade' ' , with its net of meanings of the empirical social science, that is different of ' ' acquisition of subjectivity position sexuada' '. For Evelyn Keller sort it is a social, symbolic reception system and psychic in the which men and women differently they are placed. ' ' …… The sort expression is as a cognitiva experience in which the masculine psychic individuation produces an investment in the impessoalidade, the reificao and dominao' ' Keller described its project to try to understand ' ' system of science-gnero' ' emphasizing the social construction and concentrating themselves in the psicodinmicos aspects of this construction, Keller developed its thesis with the objective to know as the construction of men and women affected the construction of science. Haraway still cites theoreticians as Carby, Spillers, Hurtado who had questioned the concept of sort through an exploration of the history and the consequences of these subjects.
E concludes its article saying that the fact to remain man or woman marked for the sort is a question eminently politics, therefore the power clarifying politician and of the category ' ' social' ' on sort it depends on the historicizao of the categories of sex, meat, body, biology, race and nature, that had generated the concept of sex system/sort at a moment and a particular place in the implodidas theory feminist being in, located articulated, differentiated, responsible theories of the corporificao and with consequences, in which the nature more is not imagined and represented as resource for the culture or the sex for the sort. Being thus the sort concept it was developed as a category to explore what it means ' ' mulher' ' , to problematizar what he was previously given. The differences between men and women are marked strong by the society who we live. The form to deal with one or another sex is delimitante factor in the social relations. Since small we are codified by the biological sex and predestined to follow the social standards destined to each one of them.
When the trainee came back to the section where he worked, already he was not a trainee, therefore the guillotine of Maximiliem had decaptado it to Robespierre. Pablo registered occurrence in 5 police station of the Policy Civilian of the Federal District. The fury of the president of the STJ, in thesis, if would fit in the crime of moral siege, and would have severely to be punished, case the inquiry of the STF concludes that the minister committed the alleged facts. If a brutality of this cannot leave to pass uninjured. The career of the magistrate, possibly constructed with very work and study, beyond the qualities that if they demand of a magistrate cannot eximiz it of the legal responsibility, quite to the contrary, its power and its knowledge functions as aggravations for the act insane.
The magistrate must be an example of to be followed behavior. However, he will be that we can or we must follow the model of behavior of the minister? The professor and Alberto sociologist Carlos Almeida ' wrote the book; ' The Head of the Brasileiro' ' , a workmanship that argues the moral and ethical behavior of the Brazilian, with special focus for the study of ' ' jeitinho brasileiro' ' , where some people if find equal than all and still they use themselves of the expression: ' ' You know with who you are falando' '. Antidemocratic attitude occured discriminatory in the STJ discloses the attitude patrimonialista of the Public Agents, who transform the use of public good into particular use, as she became at the time of ' ' El Rei' '. Summary resignation, without defense or contraditrio. I control and you obey. He only remains in to wait them the decision of the constitutional guard of the Country, the STF, and to make choir with Boris Casoy: THIS IS A SHAME!
Only the first three stages of life for every individual's specific, differing from other people bodily form, having visible to us: color, size, weight, volume. Beginning with the fourth form of life, the human soul and its material elements enter into more complex relationships that are not associated with a particular body shape, discernible human senses. These relationships are maintained at the level of the material, which we probably will soon learn to distinguish or identify with sophisticated instruments. I think that such tools are already able to provide us today: science, engineering and technology. But I know and categorically affirm that the material (physical) part of the remains with each individual and after the death of his warm-blooded forms and continues to be strong relationship with his soul. All human incarnation, and those who are endowed with flesh; those who have been more complex material structure are stable, strong ideas about independence, limbs and superiority is their stage of life.
Each successive stage has a large increase in duration in comparison with the previous. Transition to each next stage of the material body of each person actively resists. But Nature is so arranged that prevent the inevitability of such a transition is impossible! The very first stage is the stage of conception. That it precedes (not in the commonly held view that in achromatic) will be discussed in the next chapter. Now focus on description of specific stages of our lives. At the moment of conception (egg fusion with the most active sperm) A person gets from the nature of any of their spiritual qualities, which at that moment generated by the Spirit, and who becomes his soul, which in turn will live life is incomparably longer than those organic compounds that are solid components of this life.
Filogeneticamente we start in them becomes human beings from the ancestral birth of common the simiescos and homindeos that are the Rhamapitecus, that in turn gave origin to the first men, amongst them the Homo Erectus, that has as representative the boy of Turkana, with the evolution of this, we start to have characteristics who are the mark of the modern man or the species Homo Sapiens as, for example, the bipedismo. The presented erect position first for the Homo Erectus was the basic step for the transformation, as well as the manufacture of instruments of work, the possible celebrations of rituals, the necessity to communicate ones with the others. These had been some steps for the biological construction of the man. But as in them we become human beings, as we appropriate in them of this condition of being social? To understand better as if gave this acquisition, will be made a brief historical summary, starting for the primitive societies that already had inherited the organizacional way them first existing primates, its main activities were the collection of what the nature gave, were nomadic and they were not organized in social classrooms. Exactly without having social division and being nomadic, the work already existed, providing a knowledge about what it was its return, later they would pass if to fix in an environment and would go to be able to discover and if to benefit of cattle agriculture and, appearing from there a economic excess. With the sprouting of the economic excess, the exploration of the man for the man became lucrative, therefore, in this way, if appropriating it its fellow creature, would relieve exceeding more, more profits. Of this relation of exploration two antagonistic classrooms appear: the ones that work and the ones that explore the work other people’s, without right the freedom, being this last one called of escravismo.
Using this exactly meant that it has for the Philosophy, the true love for the human beings also is a feeling of search for what in it lacks, being that this gap can be filled by diverse types of object. Emotionally, to love is to search the other, one somebody that supplies our affective lacks and spirituals. In the point of view of the philosophers, the love I legitimize search for its complementation. Express for Plato, and a feeling of the soul when it feels that she lost its divine condition. However, if the love in itself is a feeling many times understood in errnea way for the society, still more badly interpreted is the point of view of Plato to this respect.
For many, platonic love is that one not reached, that is only in the will far from the objective. But in the vision of Plato, the true love is the love of the soul for the knowledge and the side spiritual of the life, related to a souvenir. According to thought and philosopher, the true love is an impulse of life for the wisdom and not necessarily for a person. Plato said that we can find in the nature perfect models that do not exist physically, but are in a called plan ' ' Plan of Idias' '. Of the point of view of the Philosophy, then, the love is a force, an energy, that if manifest in the soul as a feeling of souvenirs of that the soul already had, but lost, being the love a species of lack in this point of view. Lack that is not represented by somebody crying, but yes for the impulse of that it searchs. Of this form, the platonic love is that one that is not fixed in the transitory one, in the body, in the substance. But yes what it surpasses everything this.
The autonomy is understood as the college of to supply to laws itself exactly. The autonomy possesss two components. The first one is that no external authority we is necessary to constitute or informing in them on the demands of the morality (Cf. Perez, 2005, P. 172). Each one of us knows, without it is said, what it would have to make because the moral requirements are requirements that we impose we ourselves.
As it is that in the autolegislao we can effectively controlling in them. Therefore, no external source of motivation is necessary so that our autolegislao is efficient in controlling our behavior. Thus being, in strict direction, the autonomy not only demands that the law is not given as object, as well as the will is not determined by sensible inclinations. This implies that the autonomy leaves of being legislator and starts to be heternoma. The will, if is independent, alone it can objective be determined by the moral law and subjectively by respect to this law. The mobile of the will must be the proper law.
For this reason, in the ethical plan, action is carried through not only in agreement the duty, but for having, a time that the mobile is enclosed in the law. 2 Distinction between moral and right in the kantiano thought In the kantiana doctrine the basic point of the distinction between moral and right is the mobile by which the legislation is obeyed. In this bias, the absolute reason of the duty for the duty is had concernente the moral, considered legislation internal, and another referring empirical reason to the legal legislation, that is external. To analyze the relation of the moral with the right demands that if it needs the direction these terms, that they possess, to the times, an ample meaning and another restricted one. When distinguishing the laws from the nature of the laws of the freedom, the moral term in Kant acquires ample direction.